We ran a quick test to verify claims of energy efficiency for induction cooking in comparison to conventional stoves. Check it out!
We compared prices for common alternatives to electricity and discussed some of the issues involved.
LPG Gas proved to be the most expensive and anthracite the cheapest.
We are pleased to announce that we have gained access to the very useful PowerProphet electricity consumption modelling and prediction tool.
PowerProphet enables the detailed analysis and prediction of energy consumption (kWh) and maximum demand (kVA) for virtually any set of circumstances.
We will be using it extensively to analyse and discuss various power saving topics.
M-Tech Industrial (Pty) Ltd, was commissioned by Eskom to investigate the use of heat pumps as a means of heating water as a more energy efficient alternative to household geysers.
Two detailed case studies were undertaken, one in the residential sector and the other in the commerial sector. The residentual study compared three heating methods; conventional geyser, heat pump and solar heating, while the comercial study only compared heat pumps to geysers. The study was conducted on a computer simulation program.
The conclusions drawn from the study were:
Heat pumps achieve at least 80% of the savings possible with a comparable solar water heating system, but at far lower installation cost.
Heat pumps are a cost effective technology for heating water in commercial applications.
The full report on the study is available here.
A paper presented at the Domestic Use of Energy Conference held at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology in 2006 written by Johan Delport discusses three ways to save geyser energy consumption:
- Install the geyser vertically instead of horizontally
- Install a geyser blanket and pipe insulation
- And most interestingly – he proposes the installation of a dual element (two elements triggered at slightly different temperatures) to off-set the negative effects of small withdrawals of hot water.
Small withdrawals of hot water waste disproportionally large amounts of energy because even though say only a litre or two is used from the tap, a larger amount of hot water flows from the geyser through the house piping before hot water is available. This hot water then cools in the piping and the energy used to heat it is simply wasted. In addition, the geyser element is switched on by the thermostat which detects the small drop in temperature caused by cold water flowing into the geyser to replace hot water flowing out.
The dual element concept reduces the impact of small water withdrawals to some extent because only one of the two elements switches on (the water temperature does not drop enough to trigger both elements for small withdrawals). The same happens when the heated water cools and the thermostat activates to reheat water in the geyser.
Another point made in the paper is that thermostats are simple devices that are prone to “overshooting” the set point temperature to some degree. A dual element reduces the amount of energy used to overheat the water for small withdrawals of hot water.
The paper claims a saving of 40kWh per month for a 4kW dual element (2x2kW).
These dual elements are designed to fit standard geysers and have been accepted by Voltex as stock items. They will be available at retailers such as Builders Warehouse within a few weeks apparently.
Click here to download the complete paper.